Listen and Subscribe
Podcast Transcript
For thousands of years, educators have wrestled with the question: what knowledge does a person truly need?
The answer once included seven formal subjects that established the foundation of education from ancient Greece through the medieval university.
The subjects have changed dramatically over time, but the underlying idea has survived.
Learn more about the origins, evolution, and continued relevance of the Liberal Arts on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
You’ve probably heard the phrase “liberal arts” with respect to liberal arts colleges.
But what exactly are liberal arts, why are they called that, and what makes a liberal arts college different from any other college?
The liberal arts are a broad tradition of education intended to develop a person’s general intellectual abilities rather than to train them for a single occupation.
Historically, they were the subjects thought necessary for a free person to participate intelligently in civic life. Over time, the term expanded from a very specific ancient and medieval curriculum into the much broader collection that we associate with liberal arts education today
The word “liberal” in this context has nothing to do with modern political liberalism. In fact, the word “liberal” is one of the most confusing in modern English because it can mean so many different things depending on context, some of which are diametrically opposed to each other.
Liberal, in the context of the liberal arts, comes from the Latin word liberalis, meaning “appropriate to a free person,” which itself comes from liber, meaning “free.”
Liberal education was contrasted with vocational or mechanical training, which prepared someone to perform a particular trade. The goal was not simply to make a living, but to cultivate judgment, eloquence, reasoning, and an understanding of the world.
The basic idea originated in ancient Greece, although the formal list of liberal arts developed later.
Greek thinkers increasingly asked what sort of education was appropriate for a citizen of the polis. In Athens, in particular, political participation required people to speak persuasively, understand arguments, judge evidence, and participate in public affairs.
The Sophists were itinerant teachers in ancient Greece who taught rhetoric, argumentation, and other skills useful for success in politics and public life. Plato strongly criticized some Sophists, but he shared the broader assumption that education should develop the intellect.
Plato’s educational program, especially in the Republic, emphasized subjects such as arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, music, and dialectic. These were valuable not merely for their practical uses but because they trained the mind to think abstractly.
Aristotle similarly distinguished between education appropriate for free citizens and training primarily aimed at earning a livelihood. He believed education should help cultivate virtue and prepare people to participate in political and intellectual life.
The Greeks did not yet have the exact medieval list of the liberal arts, but many of its ingredients were already present.
The Romans inherited Greek educational ideas and provided the terminology from which expression “liberal arts” derives. Roman writers spoke of the artes liberales, the arts or disciplines appropriate for a free person.
One of the most important figures was Cicero, who emphasized the education of the ideal statesman and orator. For Cicero, eloquence alone was insufficient. A good speaker needed broad knowledge of history, philosophy, law, politics, and human nature. The Roman ideal of the educated person therefore combined knowledge with the ability to communicate and reason.
Cicero has come up enough times now that he is definitely worth his own episode, sooner rather than later.
During late antiquity, scholars gradually organized this broad educational tradition into a standardized curriculum.
By the early Middle Ages, the liberal arts had become organized into seven disciplines, divided into two groups.
The first three constituted the trivium. This included grammar, rhetoric, and logic.
Grammar was the foundation of the trivium. Medieval grammar meant much more than learning rules about sentence construction. Because Latin was the language of the Church, scholarship, law, and higher education, students first had to learn to read and write Latin fluently. Instruction involved memorizing vocabulary, grammatical forms, declensions, conjugations, and rules of syntax.
Grammar also included interpreting literature, so students might study works by Virgil, Ovid, Cicero, or Christian writers while learning how language conveyed meaning.
Having studied Latin myself the last few years, I say that I’ve learned more about grammar and sentence structure trying to learn Latin than I ever did studying English in school
Rhetoric taught students how to communicate persuasively and effectively. Its roots lay in the Greek and Roman tradition of public speaking. Students learned how to organize an argument, choose appropriate language, appeal to an audience, and employ figures of speech.
In practice, a medieval student might be asked to compose a formal letter, construct a sermon, deliver a speech, or rewrite a passage in a more persuasive style. One important medieval branch of rhetoric was the ars dictaminis, the art of composing formal letters, which became extremely useful in church and government administration.
Logic taught students how to determine whether an argument was valid. Medieval logic drew heavily on Aristotle, whose logical works became central to university education
Teaching was often highly interactive. A master might pose a proposition, after which students would argue both for and against it before attempting to resolve the issue. This developed into the formal medieval practice of the disputation, in which competing arguments were presented systematically and answered.
The trivium formed the first stage of a medieval university education. Before a student could seriously study other subjects, they first needed command of the language in which knowledge was transmitted,
Once you mastered the trivium, you could move on to the quadrivium. The quadrivium consisted of arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy.
Arithmetic was the study of numbers and numerical relationships. Medieval arithmetic was not primarily practical calculation in the modern sense. Students studied the properties of numbers, ratios, proportions, odd and even numbers, prime numbers, and numerical patterns.
Geometry dealt with magnitude, measurement, and spatial relationships. It drew heavily on Euclid, although access to the full Elements became much more widespread in Western Europe after Latin translations from Arabic and Greek appeared in the twelfth century.
Students learned basic geometric definitions, propositions, proofs, ratios, and relationships involving lines, angles, triangles, circles, and other figures. Instruction often involved a master presenting a proposition and then demonstrating the proof step by step.
Geometry had practical applications in surveying, architecture, and astronomy, but within the liberal arts it was valued primarily as training in abstract reasoning.
Music may seem the strangest member of the quadrivium to modern people because medieval music education was heavily mathematical. Students studied the numerical ratios that produced musical intervals.
A student of the quadrivium might therefore spend more time studying proportions and harmony than learning to play an instrument. Music was also connected with the broader belief that mathematical harmony existed throughout nature and even the cosmos.
Astronomy studied the motions of the heavens using mathematics. Medieval students learned about the Sun, Moon, planets, stars, eclipses, the calendar, and the structure of the cosmos. The prevailing astronomical framework was largely derived from Aristotle and Ptolemy, with a geocentric worldview.
Astronomy in medieval education also overlapped with astrology, which was widely regarded as a legitimate application of celestial knowledge. Universities could teach astronomical calculations that were then used for astrological predictions.
The trivium and the quadrivium combined made up the seven liberal arts.
The collection of these seven subjects, and their divisions, developed over time, particularly in the 5th and 6th centuries. Later Romans such as Martianus Capella, Boethius, Cassiodorus, and Isidore of Seville all contributed to the development of the seven liberal arts.
When European universities began emerging in the eleventh through thirteenth centuries, students usually began in the faculty of arts. They studied the liberal arts before moving into advanced professional studies such as theology, law, or medicine.
The modern academic degree system preserves traces of this. The Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts degrees can be traced back to the medieval arts faculty, which taught the trivium and quadrivium.
During the Renaissance, liberal education changed considerably. Renaissance humanists placed greater emphasis on what they called the studia humanitatis, or studies of humanity. These typically included grammar, rhetoric, poetry, history, and moral philosophy.
This is one reason the modern term humanities developed.
The Renaissance ideal was that of a broadly educated individual familiar with many fields, sometimes represented by the concept of the “Renaissance man.”
Leonardo da Vinci, Leon Battista Alberti, Michelangelo, Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Francis Bacon are all commonly cited as Renaissance men because they made significant contributions across multiple fields of art, science, engineering, philosophy, or scholarship.
The Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment dramatically expanded the range of disciplines considered appropriate for general education. During the nineteenth century, universities underwent another transformation as academic disciplines became more specialized.
Subjects that once fell under broad categories such as natural philosophy became separate fields, including physics, chemistry, geology, and biology.
Social sciences such as economics, sociology, and anthropology also emerged as distinct disciplines.
As a result, the expression “liberal arts” stopped referring primarily to the original seven subjects and came to mean a broad education across many areas of knowledge.
Today, particularly in the United States, liberal arts generally encompass three broad areas.
The humanities, which include fields such as history, philosophy, literature, languages, religious studies, classics, and art history.
The social sciences, which commonly include economics, political science, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and related subjects.
Finally, the natural sciences and mathematics may also be included in liberal arts curricula, particularly when they are studied as part of a broad undergraduate education rather than specialized professional training.
Is there a big difference today between colleges that claim to be liberal arts schools and those that don’t?
The truth is… not really.
The de facto definition of a liberal arts college today, at least in the United States, is a four-year undergraduate institution that has very limited or no graduate programs.
The actual curriculum of a liberal arts college isn’t really that different from a larger university. Most undergraduate degrees require a set number of distribution credits across different departments, plus a specialization through a major.
Within a university, the liberal arts have become a shorthand for taking a bunch of classes in different departments.
The liberal arts have been criticized from almost the beginning for being insufficiently practical. Greek philosophers argued about whether education should cultivate virtue and wisdom or teach immediately useful skills.
The same argument continues today when people question the value of studying philosophy, history, classics, or literature compared with engineering, computer science, or business.
The criticism has some legitimacy. Specialized professions require specialized training, and education can become detached from practical realities.
Over the last century, several people have assembled their own modern versions of the trivium and quadrivium. The truth is, given the world we live in today, there is simply way more to learn than there was 800 years ago.
Back then, it was possible, at least in theory, for one person to read almost everything that existed. Today, that is impossible. Specialization has reached a point where even the most acclaimed academics seldom know much beyond their particular area of expertise.
The liberal arts have never really been about mastering a fixed list of subjects. Their purpose has been to give people the intellectual tools needed to understand the world and participate in it.
The subjects have changed as knowledge has expanded, but the goal remains much the same: to teach people how to reason, communicate, and learn. In that sense, the liberal arts are not a relic of an older educational system.
They are an attempt to answer a question that every generation must confront: what does an educated person need to know?