Conflict of the Orders: Patrician vs Plebeian

Subscribe
Apple | Spotify | Amazon | iHeart Radio | Player.FM | TuneIn
Castbox | Podurama | Podcast Republic | RSS | Patreon


Podcast Transcript

After the founding of Rome as a city in the 8th century BC, it created a social system based on an elite few and a majority of commoners. 

This social arrangement wasn’t unique to Rome, and it has appeared in cultures and civilizations around the world.

However, Rome was one of the first cultures to experience a conflict between these classes and for the commoners to win major concessions. 

Learn more about the Conflict of the Orders and the battle between Plebeians and Patricians on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.


The events of this episode did not take place during Rome’s heyday. 

Before Rome became an empire that ruled all the lands around the Mediterranean, it was just a city on the Italian peninsula. 

Roman culture and institutions did not spring up overnight. They were created over time and often for particular reasons.

If you remember my previous episode, Rome had three distinct eras: a kingdom, a republic, and an empire. The events of this episode take place during the Roman Kingdom and the very early republic. This period is often overlooked because Rome had yet to become the power it would eventually be. 

The story starts with the founder of Rome and its first king, Romulus. There are some historians who doubt if Romulus was even a real person and believe he was just a legend, so do take this part with a grain of salt. 

Supposedly, after Romulus established a community on the seven hills of Rome, he established an advisory body made up of 100 men from the most distinguished clans of Rome. This was known as the Senate. 

The word “senate” comes from the Latin word “senex,” which literally means “old man.”

Each clan was known as a gens, a group of families that shared a name and were descendants of the same ancestor.

Each gens was led by a living male who was known as the pater, which means father in Latin. 

Members of these gens, both men and women, were known as patricians, which stems from the word pater

The patricians were a class or a social order. They were basically the aristocracy of Rome, although they didn’t have a hierarchy of titles like duke, earl, or baron. 

Being a patrician was determined by your family, not a function of wealth…although the wealthiest families in Rome were almost all patricians. 

The first 100 gens who were appointed to the Senate by Romulus became known as the gentes maiores, or the major gens. 

Rome’s fifth king, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, appointed 100 more men to the senate. Their families became known as gentes minores

Many of these families came from cities around Rome, such as Alba Longa, that Rome had defeated. 

Rome’s last king was Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, who was considered a tyrant who executed many Senators. In 509 BC, his son was accused of raping a patrician woman named Lucretia, which led to Tarquinius being overthrown by the patricians and the end of the Roman monarchy. 

One function of the Senate during the kingdom period was to elect a new king. After the monarchy was dissolved, a republic was established, which would be led by the Senate. 

Several offices were established, including consul, censor, and the seldom-used dictator. These elected positions carried with them an enormous amount of prestige for both the man and the family they came from. 

However, there was a catch. All of these positions, as well as admission to the Senate and all major religious positions, were reserved for patricians. 

Now, I have to mention the other social class in Roman society, the plebeians or plebs. 

The plebs were the majority of the Roman population. While a plebeian could, in theory, become rich, in reality, patricians held all the best land and most of the money. 

Plebs did all the hard labor and made up the majority of the army. 

Plebeians often suffered economic hardships due to heavy debts owed to Patrician creditors. Many Plebeians were small farmers who would fall into debt due to wars or poor harvests. Roman law allowed creditors to enslave debtors, creating a system where many Plebeians lost their land or freedom, exacerbating the social divide.

As you can probably guess, the complete lack of economic and political power angered the plebs and would eventually come to a head. 

This conflict between the patricians and the plebeians is known as the Conflict of the Orders, and it was a contest that lasted for over 200 years.

Just 15 years after the creation of the Republic, in 494 BC, the plebeian point of frustration was reached.

When there was a war, only landowners were allowed to fight. Pooer plebs had to abandon their farms to go and fight, whereas wealthy patricians could have their lands tended by servants and slaves. 

This was a major cause of the plebs getting into debt. 

When asked once again to go to war, this time, the plebs refused to go. In stead of fighting, the plebs seceded en masse to the Sacred Mount, known as Mons Sacer, a hill outside Rome. This mass withdrawal was a form of peaceful protest, as Rome relied heavily on Plebeian soldiers for defense.

In response, the Patricians were forced to negotiate. The result was the creation of the office of Tribunes of the Plebs, magistrates elected by the Plebeians themselves. 

These Tribunes had the power to veto actions by the Senate or other magistrates, providing the Plebeians with a form of protection against Patrician abuses.

In addition to the veto, tribunes could propose legislation, convene the Senate, and intervene on behalf of the plebs in legal matters. 

This was a huge shift in the balance of power between patricians and plebeians. It was a way for plebs to insert themselves into the affairs of the state and prevent any major legislation that would adversely affect them. 

However, while adding something new, it didn’t fundamentally change anything else. Consuls, dictators, senators, and religious officials still could only be patricians. 

A little over 40 years later, in 451 BC, the next chapter in the conflict between the classes. 

At this point in the Roman Republic, laws were unwritten and known only to Patricians, who controlled the Senate and held judicial positions. This allowed the Patricians to interpret and enforce laws as they saw fit, often to the detriment of the Plebeians.

The Plebeians, frustrated by the lack of transparency and legal equity, demanded written laws to ensure fair treatment and prevent manipulation by the ruling Patrician class. 

In response to Plebeian demands, the Roman Senate appointed a commission of ten men, known as the Decemviri, to draft a new legal code. The Decemviri produced ten tables, supplemented by two more in 450 BC. These laws were inscribed on twelve bronze tablets publicly displayed in the Roman Forum so that all citizens could know the law and their rights.

The primary purpose of the Twelve Tables was to codify and formalize existing Roman customs and practices into written law. They were not meant to create new rights or legal principles but rather to make the law accessible and consistent.

Again, this was a step forward but far from major reform. 

During the period the Decemviri convened, the tribune of the plebs and all magisterial positions were suspended for one year. A second decemvir was established, which began to abuse their power. 

The situation escalated when one of the Decemviri, Appius Claudius, attempted to seize a Plebeian woman, Verginia, leading to public outrage. 

In response, the Plebeians once again withdrew from the city to the Sacred Mount, refusing to return until their grievances were addressed. The secession forced the Senate to restore the Tribunes of the Plebs, reinstate legal protections for Plebeians, and end the Decemvirate, marking a victory for Plebeian rights and further advancing their political equality.

One of the ways that the patricians protected their status was by banning marriages between patricians and plebs. 

In 445 BC, the Lex Canuleia was passed by the Senate under pressure from the plebs. This allowed for intermarriage between members of the patrician and plebeian classes. 

Having restored their rights, there was relative calm between patricians and plebeians for several generations. That isn’t to say the plebs were happy with their status, but there were no flare-ups between the classes. 

The plebs had their tribunes, and the patricians had pretty much everything else. 

The next big change in patrician-plebeian relations took place in 367 BC. 

The Plebeian tribunes that year, Gaius Licinius Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus, proposed a law mandated that one of the two consuls, the highest political office in Rome, must be a Plebeian, thus breaking the Patrician monopoly on this key position. 

Additionally, the proposed law restricted the amount of public land that any individual could hold and placed restrictions on interest rates, aiming to address the growing economic inequality between the classes.

The law became known as the Lex Licinia Sextia, and it was a milestone in advancing the rights of the plebs. Plebeians were now on an equal footing as patricians in the highest office in the republic.

One result of this law was that it also opened the door to the two other highest offices in Rome to plebs, dictator and censor, as the holder of those offices had to be a former consul. 

The end of the Conflict of the Orders is usually defined to have ended in 287 BC with the passage of the Lex Hortensia.

It made Plebiscites, those being laws passed by the Plebeian Assembly binding on all Roman citizens, including Patricians. 

Previously, plebiscites only applied to Plebeians, limiting their effectiveness.

The Lex Hortensia effectively equalized the legislative power of the Plebeian Assembly with the traditional Patrician-dominated Senate, marking the formal end of the Conflict of the Orders.

While this was the end of the period known as the Conflict of the Orders, it was hardly the end of the evolution of the relations between plebs and patricians. 

All magisterial positions were eventually opened to plebs, and a law passed by the plebiscite known as the “Ovinian Plebiscite” allowed censors to appoint new Senators, allowing plebs a path for Senate membership.

All religious positions were eventually open to plebeians as well. 

There were consul tickets with patricians and plebians both running together to broaden their voter base. 

As Roman political institutions opened up to everyone, that is if you were male and a citizen, it shifted from birth and class status to something known as nobilitas, or nobility. 

Nobilitas was something that was more akin to merit. It was something that could be earned, either through military heroics or through political acumen. 

Someone who was the first person in their family to serve in the Senate or, later on, to be elected to consul was considered a novus homo or a new man. 

The famed Roman orator, Cicero, was perhaps the most notable person who was a novus homo. He was a plebeian and the first member of his family to have been elected consul.

Other notable noble plebeians during the late republican period include Marius, who led one of the factions in the Roman Civil War, Crassus, who was a member of the First Triumvirate and the richest man in Rome, and Pompey Magnus, Crassus’ partner in the Triumvirate, and Rome’s greatest general at the time. 

Being a member of a patrician family always carried with it some cachet but eventually didn’t necessarily bring you any legal advantage. It would sort of be like being a member of the Rockefeller family, five generations after John D. Rockefeller, or being born into an aristocratic family in modern Europe well past the era of aristocrats. 

Going into the imperial period, being a patrician became even more meaningless. Emperors would often elevate families of men who served them to patrician status because it was a very cheap reward. 

Likewise, many emperors came from the very lowest ranks of Roman society.

What Rome experienced during the two centuries of the Conflict of the Orders was not dissimilar to what other cultures and civilizations experienced throughout history. 

It didn’t establish anything close to a perfectly equitable system, but it did at least create opportunities for the best and most ambitious, who just happened to be born as plebeians.