Alternative Forms of Space Flight

Subscribe
Apple | Spotify | Amazon | iHeart Radio | Player.FM | TuneIn
Castbox | Podurama | Podcast Republic | RSS | Patreon


Podcast Transcript

Every single rocket that has ever been launched into space has been a rocket that burned some sort of fuel. 

These chemical fuel rockets have worked well for making the short trip to orbit. Beyond that point, however, they are not necessarily the best option for space travel. 

There are a host of proposed methods for space travel that don’t involve rockets, some of which have already been tested. 

Learn more about alternative forms of space flight and the possible future of space exploration on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.


If you remember back, I previously did an episode on the rocket equation. 

The rocket equation involves the difficulty of rockets and fuel. If you want to put 100kg of something into orbit, you need a whole lot more than 100kg of fuel and rockets to get your payload into orbit. 

The bigger a rocket gets, the bigger the problem becomes. The bigger the rocket, the more fuel you need, and that fuel needs fuel to lift it off, and so on. 

Almost everything I talked about in the rocket equation episode dealt with just getting into orbit. 

This episode is all about how you travel once you get to space. 

The problems with the rocket equation and fuel still apply when you get to space. If anything, the problem actually gets bigger. 

All of the space probes that we’ve sent to the outer solar system weren’t sent there totally by rocket power. They were sent to nearby planets, where they were catapulted using the force of gravity. 

The gravitational assist worked because of the alignment of the planets and because it was a one-way trip. If we just tried to use rocket power to get to the outer planets, most of the probes still wouldn’t have arrived because they’d be traveling so slowly. 

Chemical rockets can work for short distances, like maneuvering in orbit or flying to the moon or Mars, but they aren’t ideal. 

So, I want to go through the various ideas that have been proposed for how to travel in space without using a chemical reaction. 

The first type of propulsion is called ion propulsion. 

If you remember, back to my rocket equation episode, I mentioned that a rocket works by tossing hot, fast-moving gas out the back end. It would be like being in a boat with a pile of rocks and tossing the rocks backward to move the boat forward. It is due to one of Newton’s Laws of Motion, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. 

An ion drive works similarly to a regular rocket engine, except that there is no chemical reaction. 

Ion thrusters operate by using electricity to ionize a propellant, typically a noble gas like xenon, creating positively charged ions.  Xenon is an ideal fuel because it is a very heavy gas, and the heavier the gas is expelled, the more momentum the spacecraft will get. 

These ions are then accelerated by an electric field generated within the thruster, and they are ejected at high speeds. 

Ion thrusters produce a much lower thrust compared to conventional chemical rockets, and their high exhaust velocity allows them to be far more efficient, gradually enabling a spacecraft to build up high speeds over long durations. 

This makes ion thrusters particularly suitable for long-duration missions in space, where they can slowly but steadily accelerate spacecraft to high velocities.

There are several things that make ion thrusters attractive. In addition to their efficiency, they don’t require oxygen or any fuel that can combust. You just need one single fuel that doesn’t have to react with anything.

The electricity to eject the ions can be created from solar panels, which can create power indefinitely so long as you are a reasonable distance from the sun. 

Ion Thrusters and other types of electric propulsion are commonly used on satellites today for altitude control. If their orbit is decaying, they can be sent to a higher orbit, and if there is a risk of collision with something, they can move. 

Ion thrusters don’t provide enough thrust to lift something from the surface of Earth into orbit, but they are great when you just need to nudge something that is already in space. 

But what if you need something more than a nudge? What if you want the power that comes from a chemical rocket reaction, but you don’t want to use a chemical rocket? 

One solution would be a nuclear rocket.

In a previous episode, I talked about Project Orion. A plan to use literally atomic bombs as a form of propulsion. It was a hair-brained and horrible idea. 

A nuclear rocket is nothing at all like that. 

A nuclear rocket uses nuclear fuel, very similar to that used inside a nuclear reactor. The rocket engine would consist of a nuclear core that would undergo a controlled nuclear fission reaction, making it extremely hot. 

A gas would then be heated by the nuclear core, which would cause it to expand and be expelled, just like in a chemical rocket. 

The physics behind a nuclear rocket is actually pretty straightforward. The idea of using nuclear fuel for propulsion actually dates back to the 1940s. 

In 1961, the United States formed the Space Nuclear Propulsion Office, which was a joint effort between NASA and the Atomic Energy Commission.

They developed a nuclear rocket engine known as NERVA, which stood for Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application. 

Between 1962 and 1969, they conducted 48 tests of six different NERVA engine designs. Each of the designs was capable of producing over 1100 megawatts of power. 

During its longest test, it was able to operate at full power for an entire hour. 

So, this isn’t some theoretical pie-in-the-sky technology.  Depending on the design, and there are several different ones, nuclear propulsion can be 3 to 5 times more efficient than chemical rockets. 

NASA and DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, have announced they are currently working on a nuclear power rocket called DRACO, which stands for Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations. 

DRACO is currently scheduled to be tested in space sometime in 2027. 

Nuclear propulsion is the only realistic option for travel within the solar system currently. 

A chemical rocket would take eight months to travel from the Earth to Mars. A nuclear rocket could make the trip in just 45 days. 

Moreover, it would only require carrying lightweight hydrogen and no oxygen. While hydrogen would be the best fuel, and it is the most abundant element in the universe, other gases could be used as well, which can be harvested on other planets or moons. 

The current efforts in nuclear propulsion are the most serious that have been undertaken, and even companies like Space X are currently investigating nuclear propulsion as well. 

While nuclear thermal propulsion might be a good, realistic technology for exploring the solar system, what about if we wanted to travel further?

Here, we start to get into more theoretical forms of travel. 

All of the systems I’ve just mentioned do require some form of fuel to be expelled. But what if you didn’t need any fuel at all? 

Instead of expelling matter via a nozzle, could it be possible to just push a spacecraft externally?

The answer is…..yes. 

It’s called a solar sail, and it works on the principle that light can exert a very weak amount of pressure. Despite having no mass, photons do, in fact, have momentum. 

This takes many people by surprise because the definition of momentum is literally mass x velocity. However, the equation only holds at Newtonian levels that we deal with on a daily basis. At the relativistic speeds that light travels at, it does have momentum. 

To capture the very weak pressure of light, you’d need a very large sail, potentially many square kilometers in area. Moreover, the sail would have to be extremely thin and lightweight. 

The benefit of a solar sail is that while the pressure from light is small, it’s constant. Once you unfurl a solar sail, the pressure from the sun would constantly accelerate the ship, which over time would seriously add up. 

In 2010, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency launched and deployed “IKAROS,” which was the first true interplanetary solar sail. It only had an acceleration of 1 mm/s2, which isn’t much, but it was constant. 

Likewise, NASA and the Planetary Society have both deployed test small-scale solar sails. 

A solar sail is often thought to be the preferred method for sending a probe to a nearby star. 

You deploy a large solar sail, point it at a star like Proxima Century, and let the Sun accelerate it until it leaves the solar system. It could theoretically reach speeds of up to 0.1% of the speed of light. 

Then, as it approaches the other star, the process will work in reverse. The light from the star would push the other way, slowing the solar sail down. 

But what if you wanted to go even faster? One option that has been floated would be propelling a solar sail with powerful lasers on Earth or the Moon. The ship wouldn’t even need propulsion or fuel as everything would be powered from Earth. 

Again, the science behind solar sails is pretty well established and there have been tests run, so this isn’t something that is in the realm of science fiction. It is a real technology that just hasn’t been deployed on a wide scale.

Even if a solar sail traveled at 1/1000th, the speed of light would still take a long time to get to another star. So, is there anything even better that is possible?

One idea is to collect fuel as you go. In 1960, physicist Robert Bussard proposed an interstellar ramjet. 

The idea here is pretty simple. Space is not a perfect vacuum. Even in interstellar space, there are random hydrogen atoms floating around. The nose of the ramjet would be a giant funnel that would scoop up all of the stray hydrogen atoms and gas molecules as the ship was flying. 

In Bussard’s initial proposal, the hydrogen would literally be compressed until fusion occurred, but that is now considered to be impossible. Nonetheless, it would be a way to get fuel during a long interstellar flight.

If you could collect enough gas, then it could provide an enormous amount of acceleration for even a nuclear-powered spacecraft. 

I’m not going to even get into proposals such as fusion engines or anti-matter propulsion because those are all still in the realm of science fiction at this point. We have to figure out how to harness fusion or create anti-matter before we can start thinking of applications for it in space flight. 

However, all of the other methods of propulsion I’ve mentioned in this episode are very much real technologies that have either been deployed, like ion thrusters, or are in the testing stage already. 

These new methods of propulsion will be necessary if humanity ever hopes to explore the Solar System beyond Earth’s orbit.