<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backing Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/</link>
	<description>Gary Arndt&#039;s journey to travel blog around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>I use the external hard-disks for backup, I&#039;ve tried CD&#039;s/DVD&#039;s but the weight, bulk and time it took to burn them was just prohibitive.

What I&#039;ve settled on now is two external USB hard-disks. One large capacity one and the other cheapest price/storage ratio at the time.

I upload photos to my laptop HD and to the cheap HD. The large capacity HD is a backup of my laptop disk (I use SuperDuper).  As the cheap drive fills up I can mail it back and get a new one.  If the laptop drive fills up then I archive all the photo&#039;s off onto a HD and send that back as well (safety backup) and clean out the old stuff from the laptop to free up room.

If one of the drives crashes I always have a backup HD to restore from, also sending the cheap HD back periodically I can check to make sure they arrive and make a new copy if there is any problems (there hasn&#039;t ever been so far). This is not fool-proof as you could loose some recent photo&#039;s if your bags are stolen.

I like the idea of online backup but have found internet connections while traveling just too problematic (slow speeds, disconnects, spotty connections), especially since I also work with RAW.  I&#039;ve had a bit better success zipping all the files into several larger files for upload (works a bit faster then doing the individual files) but due to disconnects you can&#039;t make the files too large.

I&#039;ve also had some success planning my travel around &quot;hub-cities&quot; that have very good internet connection. So travel for a bit in third-world and then schedule in a major city (Bangkok, Singapore, etc..) where you can get good internet connection and spend a couple days doing all the backup from there.

Future-Wise the SanDisk write-once memory format might actually be viable (http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/1gb-write-once-sandisk-memory-cards-to-cost-5-99/). But it is still costly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the external hard-disks for backup, I&#8217;ve tried CD&#8217;s/DVD&#8217;s but the weight, bulk and time it took to burn them was just prohibitive.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve settled on now is two external USB hard-disks. One large capacity one and the other cheapest price/storage ratio at the time.</p>
<p>I upload photos to my laptop HD and to the cheap HD. The large capacity HD is a backup of my laptop disk (I use SuperDuper).  As the cheap drive fills up I can mail it back and get a new one.  If the laptop drive fills up then I archive all the photo&#8217;s off onto a HD and send that back as well (safety backup) and clean out the old stuff from the laptop to free up room.</p>
<p>If one of the drives crashes I always have a backup HD to restore from, also sending the cheap HD back periodically I can check to make sure they arrive and make a new copy if there is any problems (there hasn&#8217;t ever been so far). This is not fool-proof as you could loose some recent photo&#8217;s if your bags are stolen.</p>
<p>I like the idea of online backup but have found internet connections while traveling just too problematic (slow speeds, disconnects, spotty connections), especially since I also work with RAW.  I&#8217;ve had a bit better success zipping all the files into several larger files for upload (works a bit faster then doing the individual files) but due to disconnects you can&#8217;t make the files too large.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also had some success planning my travel around &#8220;hub-cities&#8221; that have very good internet connection. So travel for a bit in third-world and then schedule in a major city (Bangkok, Singapore, etc..) where you can get good internet connection and spend a couple days doing all the backup from there.</p>
<p>Future-Wise the SanDisk write-once memory format might actually be viable (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/1gb-write-once-sandisk-memory-cards-to-cost-5-99/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/20/1gb-write-once-sandisk-memory-cards-to-cost-5-99/</a>). But it is still costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archondigital</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>archondigital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>From a designer&#039;s perspective, I prefer working 
with RAW files from photographers for compositions.

So better keep em&#039; RAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a designer&#8217;s perspective, I prefer working<br />
with RAW files from photographers for compositions.</p>
<p>So better keep em&#8217; RAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>It seems to me like postal service is going to be more reliable than internet access going forward. Uploading 160 gigs of files to an FTP server is going to be slow no matter where you are.

I&#039;d seriously think about just sending everything back via postal. But look at using CF cards instead of USB drives. Drives are heavier, more expensive to ship and prone to mechanical failure (I have a brand new external drive sitting on my desk and it started dying almost out of the box). CF cards are more expensive but my hunch is that you&#039;ll save money in the long term.

Also, you can look into replacing your macbook/ibook with a model with a dual layer burner. Gives you 8 gigs a disc and it&#039;ll burn them faster. Once they&#039;re in the states though, they need to be backed up to a reliable system because optical media really isn&#039;t idea for archival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me like postal service is going to be more reliable than internet access going forward. Uploading 160 gigs of files to an FTP server is going to be slow no matter where you are.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d seriously think about just sending everything back via postal. But look at using CF cards instead of USB drives. Drives are heavier, more expensive to ship and prone to mechanical failure (I have a brand new external drive sitting on my desk and it started dying almost out of the box). CF cards are more expensive but my hunch is that you&#8217;ll save money in the long term.</p>
<p>Also, you can look into replacing your macbook/ibook with a model with a dual layer burner. Gives you 8 gigs a disc and it&#8217;ll burn them faster. Once they&#8217;re in the states though, they need to be backed up to a reliable system because optical media really isn&#8217;t idea for archival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2263</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2263</guid>
		<description>Depending the space you have with your webhost, that&#039;s what I would do... create a private folder, and FTP away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending the space you have with your webhost, that&#8217;s what I would do&#8230; create a private folder, and FTP away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>My backup and storage problem would still exist if I shot in JPEG, it is just that the numbers would be different. Because I can get HDs in the hundreds of gb now, I don&#039;t think it is that big of a deal. 

The only place where RAW/JPEG file size would matter to me in on the camera, and I have enough memory I carry with me to take over 300+ RAW photos before I have to save the files.

Even if Flickr did store RAW files, I only upload about 10% of what I shoot to Flickr. 

I&#039;ve gone with RAW this far so I&#039;m going to stick with it. I&#039;ve been getting more requests to use my photos in books/magazines, and I eventually want to sell prints.  I think the extra headache will pay off in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My backup and storage problem would still exist if I shot in JPEG, it is just that the numbers would be different. Because I can get HDs in the hundreds of gb now, I don&#8217;t think it is that big of a deal. </p>
<p>The only place where RAW/JPEG file size would matter to me in on the camera, and I have enough memory I carry with me to take over 300+ RAW photos before I have to save the files.</p>
<p>Even if Flickr did store RAW files, I only upload about 10% of what I shoot to Flickr. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone with RAW this far so I&#8217;m going to stick with it. I&#8217;ve been getting more requests to use my photos in books/magazines, and I eventually want to sell prints.  I think the extra headache will pay off in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I don&#039;t know that you should really be shooting in RAW to begin with.  Sure, it&#039;s a nice format that allows you to clean up nearly any mishap with your technical chops, but there are just too many downsides to it

 1) RAW photos are exceptionally large, and if you switched to high quality JPEG you&#039;d be able to take three times the photos in a smaller space.
 2) Flickr stores almost all other formats, so if you had a pro account you could use Flickr as a form of backup.
3) Your photography is great so far, and after a year of practice you probably don&#039;t need the insurance that you can fix any of your mistakes.  Half of photography is taking mediocre pictures anyway.
4) RAW files require not only more space, but more work if you want to have them viewable or printable or sendable anyway since you have to composite them.

So although the portable HD sounds like the best option right now, it seems to me that it&#039;s indicative of a larger problem.  I&#039;d start switching to JPEG (except for weird lighting conditions) and use Flickr as a backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t know that you should really be shooting in RAW to begin with.  Sure, it&#8217;s a nice format that allows you to clean up nearly any mishap with your technical chops, but there are just too many downsides to it</p>
<p> 1) RAW photos are exceptionally large, and if you switched to high quality JPEG you&#8217;d be able to take three times the photos in a smaller space.<br />
 2) Flickr stores almost all other formats, so if you had a pro account you could use Flickr as a form of backup.<br />
3) Your photography is great so far, and after a year of practice you probably don&#8217;t need the insurance that you can fix any of your mistakes.  Half of photography is taking mediocre pictures anyway.<br />
4) RAW files require not only more space, but more work if you want to have them viewable or printable or sendable anyway since you have to composite them.</p>
<p>So although the portable HD sounds like the best option right now, it seems to me that it&#8217;s indicative of a larger problem.  I&#8217;d start switching to JPEG (except for weird lighting conditions) and use Flickr as a backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archondigital</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>archondigital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>Your better off with buying and shipping external hard drives to the U.S.

DVD backups aren&#039;t really safe and sometimes they get damaged or warped when shipping no matter how secure you pack them.

You can also consider getting a dedicated box or like what katty just said; amazon S3 and Transmit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your better off with buying and shipping external hard drives to the U.S.</p>
<p>DVD backups aren&#8217;t really safe and sometimes they get damaged or warped when shipping no matter how secure you pack them.</p>
<p>You can also consider getting a dedicated box or like what katty just said; amazon S3 and Transmit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>Your site has won a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogofthedayawards.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog of the Day Award&lt;/a&gt; (BOTDA)

 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogofthedayawards.blogspot.com/2006/06/blog-of-day-awards-code-for-winners.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Award Code&lt;/a&gt;

 

Thank you,

 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://quotes.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;famous quotes&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site has won a <a href="http://blogofthedayawards.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Blog of the Day Award</a> (BOTDA)</p>
<p><a href="http://blogofthedayawards.blogspot.com/2006/06/blog-of-day-awards-code-for-winners.html" rel="nofollow">Award Code</a></p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p><a href="http://quotes.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">famous quotes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>hey gary,

thanks for visiting my travel site. I emailed you a couple of questions about the html code you use on your site...

i&#039;ll keep reading here...keep stopping by mine!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey gary,</p>
<p>thanks for visiting my travel site. I emailed you a couple of questions about the html code you use on your site&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll keep reading here&#8230;keep stopping by mine!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going for small, an external hard drive is your best bet. I got mine from Costco a year ago, and it&#039;s literally smaller than two decks of cards. It&#039;s 160GB and cost less than $100. Since prices go down and storage goes up, you should be able to find something compact but huge and reliable! Getting a giant capacity would probably be nice, but for ease of packing and size, it might be wiser to get a couple smaller ones instead. Good luck with your search!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going for small, an external hard drive is your best bet. I got mine from Costco a year ago, and it&#8217;s literally smaller than two decks of cards. It&#8217;s 160GB and cost less than $100. Since prices go down and storage goes up, you should be able to find something compact but huge and reliable! Getting a giant capacity would probably be nice, but for ease of packing and size, it might be wiser to get a couple smaller ones instead. Good luck with your search!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://everything-everywhere.com/2008/04/03/backing-up/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t much help, but I hope you&#039;ll find a solution.  I would think that online server would be better, but in your case, since you don&#039;t always have a stable internet connection, a portable HD might be better.  1TB drives are relatively cheap these days, so I would just recommend a bigger HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t much help, but I hope you&#8217;ll find a solution.  I would think that online server would be better, but in your case, since you don&#8217;t always have a stable internet connection, a portable HD might be better.  1TB drives are relatively cheap these days, so I would just recommend a bigger HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 2/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 433/438 objects using disk: basic

Served from: everything-everywhere.com @ 2012-02-12 16:11:11 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Cache key:          w3tc_everything-everywhere.com_1_page_df498446ead30d7841951d234ae8c78b_gzip
Caching:            enabled
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      1.211s
Header info:
ETag:               "743eaee8206f45401834e37ae2a1a8de"
Link:               <http://everything-everywhere.com/?p=546>; rel=shortlink
Last-Modified:      Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:25:38 GMT
Vary:               Accept-Encoding, Cookie
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.2.4
Content-Encoding:   gzip
X-Pingback:         http://everything-everywhere.com/xmlrpc.php
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->
